The Confidence Curve: The Missing Metric in Outpatient Surgery

Engivio Inc.
September 22, 2025

Outpatient hip and knee replacements are one of modern surgery’s success stories – patients get new joints and go home the same day. But there’s a missing metric that rarely makes the post-op checklist: patient confidence. Surgeons skillfully replace joints and send patients home within hours. What happens next, between discharge and the first PT session? Many patients hit what we call the “confidence curve”: an initial high of “I’m home!” followed by a dip in morale, doubt, and fear before physical therapy or recovery milestones start to rebuild their trust.

This isn’t a feel-good idea. It’s a clinically actionable signal. Ignoring it comes at a cost: poor adherence, stalled recovery, unnecessary ER visits. Let’s explore why confidence deserves a permanent seat next to pain scores and range of motion – and what it takes to make it visible.

Where Confidence Slips and Why It Matters

The hours and days after surgery often start with relief: “I’m home.”

But that feeling can quickly give way to doubt. “Am I doing this right?” “Should it still hurt this much?” “What if I mess something up?”

Early in recovery, it’s common for patients to experience emotional lows well before their first physical therapy visit. In fact, one recent analysis found that by 3 months after knee replacement, 76% of patients reported lingering depressive symptoms (mostly mild) even as their bodies were healing (Neelaraju et al., 2023). Other studies have noted that high early anxiety is a clear predictor of subpar recovery – anxious patients are less likely to stick to their rehab plan, tend to make slower progress, and are more prone to unplanned medical visits for reassurance (Alattas et al., 2016; Knapp et al., 2021).

In short, when confidence dips, so do outcomes.

The Science Behind Confidence and Recovery Outcomes

Clinical literature increasingly supports what care teams have long observed: confident patients recover better. Here’s how:

  1. Rehab Adherence: Patients with high confidence in their recovery process (a concept often termed self-efficacy) are far more likely to follow their exercise regimens, even in the face of pain or fatigue (Du et al., 2025). Conversely, low confidence predicts non-adherence – those who doubt their ability to recover often skip exercises or drop out of therapy early. Research has shown that preoperative self-efficacy is an independent predictor of better functional outcomes one year after knee replacement (Wylde et al.,2012), underscoring how crucial a patient’s belief in their own progress can be.
  2. Complications and Delayed Healing: Avoiding movement due to fear or uncertainty leads to objectively poorer outcomes. Patients who are afraid to move that new joint (or kinesiophobia) often end up with stiffness, muscle loss, higher thrombosis risk, or other complications from inactivity (Du et al., 2025). In essence, fear of pain creates a vicious cycle: the patient avoids activity, which then slows healing and creates more issues. Early mobilization is critical after surgery, and confidence makes the difference between a patient doing their ankle pumps and walks versus staying in bed.
  3. Avoidable ER Visits: Patients who feel unsupported or unsure are more likely to interpret normal recovery sensations as emergencies, leading them to unnecessary doctor calls or ER visits for reassurance. Studies confirm this cascade. For example, in one review of joint replacement recoveries, about 5% of readmissions were attributable simply to “failure to cope” – in other words, patients coming back because they felt they couldn’t handle recovery at home (Knapp et al., 2021). Proper support and confidence-building can prevent these costly visits by helping patients understand what’s normal and manageable.

Why Traditional Systems Miss It

Despite its importance, confidence doesn’t show up in most recovery protocols. Surgical teams meticulously track joint angles, wound healing, and pain scores – but not whether a patient believes they can heal. And it shows in the data: psychological distress after surgery is vastly under-recognized in the medical record. The study by Knapp and team (2021) on joint replacement outcomes noted that mental health factors like anxiety often go unaddressed in current pathways, with no formal process to monitor or treat these issues as part of standard care . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols emphasize things like early mobility, nutrition, and opioid sparing, but they often omit dedicated psychological reassurance or confidence tracking. In practice, that means a huge gap: only a tiny fraction of post-surgical anxiety or mood crashes ever get coded or flagged, even though they may be common. In short, recovery pathways measure what’s visible – incisions, vitals, range of motion. Confidence isn’t visible, so it’s overlooked until its absence causes a problem.

New Tools to Catch the Dip Before It Slows Progress

This is where new digital recovery platforms are stepping up. For example, our platform Engivio blends AI-guided monitoring with human coaching to spot confidence slumps early – when they’re still course-correctable. The system checks in daily with patients, gathering quick inputs on pain, mood, mobility, and self-efficacy. If a patient reports struggling or expresses doubt, we get an instant alert. That prompts timely intervention: perhaps a reassuring message, a motivational tip, or a phone call from a recovery coach or nurse. It’s essentially a post-op safety net focused not just on physical symptoms but on outlook. By tracking the “confidence curve” in real time, we can catch a dip in morale on, say, Day 3 post-op – and address it before it cascades into missed exercises or a panicked hospital visit. Confidence is a leading indicator, not a lagging metric. And with tools like this, it’s finally measurable on a daily basis.

The Confidence Curve as a Clinical Signal

We already track range of motion and pain meticulously. Why not add confidence to the recovery chart? In fact, forward-thinking programs are doing just that. Validated tools like the Oxford Arthroplasty Early Recovery Score (OARS) now include patient mood, confidence, and coping ability as part of structured recovery tracking (Strickland et al., 2020). This kind of metric is a powerful signal – one that has real predictive value. Crucially, it’s actionable: unlike a patient’s age or a comorbidity, confidence can be strengthened with the right support.

Consider what we see in outcomes data when confidence is high vs. low:

  • High-confidence patients: They engage fully in rehab, hit their milestones sooner, and often report higher satisfaction with their surgical outcome. They’re also less likely to trigger preventable costs – they don’t call the surgeon’s office in a panic over normal aches, because they trust the process. Studies consistently show that patients with strong self-belief recover faster and more completely (Wylde et al.,2012).
  • Low-confidence patients: They are the ones most likely to drop off from therapy, skip exercises, or need extra phone calls. They tend to show up in the ER for reassurance about pain or mobility fears that could have been managed at home. Not surprisingly, this group takes longer to heal. For instance, preoperative anxiety and depression have been correlated with lower patient satisfaction and higher 90-day readmission rates after joint replacement (Knapp et al., 2021). In a value-based care world, these are exactly the outcomes we work to avoid.

In short, confidence isn’t “soft” – it’s a lever. One that can reduce costs, boost functional outcomes, and improve the patient experience.

Final Word

We’re trained to treat the physical, but post-surgical recovery is never just physical. It’s a cognitive, emotional, and behavioral journey as well. If a patient doesn’t believe they’re on track – that they will recover – everything else becomes harder. The good news is that confidence can be nurtured. By making it visible and measurable, we empower care teams to intervene early: to give an encouraging nudge, to celebrate a small win, or to clear up a scary misconception. In our practice, we’ve seen how a single well-timed reassurance can get a patient back on the rails.

The “confidence curve” shouldn’t be an afterthought; it should be a core vital sign of recovery. Let’s design systems and checklists that elevate patient confidence alongside pain control and mobilization. We’re already doing this at Engivio, and the impact is tangible. When patients feel supported and confident, they do better – and so do our outcomes. It’s time to give confidence a permanent seat in the outpatient surgery playbook.

Sources & Further Reading

  1. Neelaraju, H., Gangaiah, M., & Mittal, P. (2023). Surgical healing beyond the scalpel: exploring the impact of depressive symptoms on functional recovery in total knee arthroplasty patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04302-6
  2. Alattas, S. A., Smith, T., Bhatti, M., Wilson-Nunn, D., & Donell, S. (2016). Greater pre-operative anxiety, pain and poorer function predict a worse outcome of a total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 25(11), 3403–3410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4314-8
  3. Knapp, P., Layson, J. T., Mohammad, W., Pizzimenti, N., & Markel, D. C. (2021). The effects of depression and anxiety on 90-day readmission rates after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today, 10, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.06.013
  4. Du, X., Shao, Y., Xue, J., & Kong, J. (2025). Prevalence and influencing factors of kinesiophobia after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05752-w
  5. Wylde, V., Dixon, S., & Blom, A. (2012). The Role of Preoperative Self‐Efficacy in Predicting Outcome after Total Knee Replacement. Musculoskeletal Care, 10(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1008
  6. Strickland, L. H., Murray, D. W., Pandit, H. G., & Jenkinson, C. (2020). Development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) and change measure for use in early recovery following hip or knee replacement. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00262-1

Share this post